I would entrust an independent agency or party to perform such testing infinitely sooner and more than I would entrust such testing to the parties that are burdened with the compliance standards, Steve.
Also, and I know this for a fact, plenty, if not most $500 helmets (most of which in this country are both DOT and Snell approved) will do a better job of protecting your coconut than a $200 helmet. I have a friend here locally that owns the foremost sport bike performance, maintenance, upgrade and repair biz in this tri-state region (Metro NY,NJ &PA) who has a collection of both categories of lids that his customers (some of whom are dead or braindead) suffered bad and/or high speed accidents with and the costlier helmets have protected their users far greater than the less expensive, DOT only helmets.
I have had only two mishaps in my nearly 49 years of riding experience and bth resulted in two different Honda VTX 1800s being totaled out by my insuror. Neither inciident was my fault whatsoever. One took place at 65 mph, the speed at which my head collided with the macadam and the other occurred at about 30 mph. without a full face in the first instance, I'm dead, no ifs ands or buts. That Arai helmet definitely saved my life. In the second case I smacked my head at least twice, once against a quarter panel of the moving vehicle which struck me and once again when i went down and smacked my Bel satr enshrouded noggin against the pavement. In both instances there was not a mark on my head, not a sore neck, literally no evidence at all that my head participated at all with the rest of my body in either accident. Both lids were and still are both Snell and DOT approved. Given the hard experiences I have survives, I surely wouldn't think for even one NYC moment to test your theory about the differences in protective integrity between a premium helmet and a more economical one. That's just my hard earned take on it, though!