Your second photo is much improved, IMO.
The CES can is smaller diameter at the end than yours. The top of it should pass just at or under the rear axle bolt on mine.
I want as much room as possible for panniers. If I have to use them for a long trip, I want the largest possible and mine are 23 L, 19.5 H & 14.4 W.
I also like the look of the straighter, more parallel to the ground, look better than upswept.
I be curious what you had to do to change the can angle on yours? Was it a big deal?
The production C.E.S. Pipe is a bit lower at the back than mine. I wanted mine to follow the line of the bottom of the tin cover that go's over the rear footpeg bracket. As I said earlier my headers are slightly different to the production one and so is my muffler. Here's some photo's showing the difference at the rear footpeg. 1olbull@
@bruce aussie I see two different cans.
I shall pick the slant cut one and have it brought down just below the rear axle bolt.
Thanks for the pix, Mate.
Well, it's time for a few hours rack time before riding out for RAA Montrose!
nitey-nite!
@1olbull The slant cut one is the production pipe. It is about 3-1/2 inches shorter than mine and if you have a close look at the photo's the top one is mine it runs up closer to the footpeg than the production muffler.
@bruce aussie I see two different cans.
I shall pick the slant cut one and have it brought down just below the rear axle bolt.
Thanks for the pix, Mate.
Well, it's time for a few hours rack time before riding out for RAA Montrose!
nitey-nite!