1olbull
Riding Motor Since 1950
If your talking about torque of the axle nut I would not leanthat way unless you tightenit up so much that it crushes the spacer bushing between the two wheel bearings thenyou would have undue stress or pressure on the sides of the rollers and sides of the race grooves creating premature wear. Likewise if during original assembly if a spacer got by QA and was dimensionally short you would create the same type of excessive load. What could also have been done at the plant that makes the wheel for Triumph is the bearing could have been pressed inslightly crooked which could gaul the bore in a spot piling the metal up as the bearing goes in. With the gauled material piled up as it goes in the bearing would bottom out cockeyed out of alignment which would have undue pressure when the axle was torqued plus it would also act likethe bore was smaller then specified tolerance again squeezing down on the outer race a eliminate the running clearance betweenthe rollersand the races again extraheat dispates the grease as the seal ztarts to leak or acting like a interference fit. Myself I freeze bearings androp them in the bore then use a press to hold the in while they warm back up. Same with press fit bushings. Remember metal to metal or in layman terms if OD and ID are the same size it still fits in the interference class of fit.
There is NO galling in my rear wheel as I inspected it thoroughly.
If there is a next time, I shall indicator the bored for concentricity, as suggested by @Rocket3Pilot.
Perhaps I will locate a castellated nut and drill the axle for a cotter so I can safely experiment with slightly less torque?