9secondsflat
.040 Over
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 80
off idle, the 240 package is making more torque and more hp through the entire rev range...no comparison with stock.
if you dont want to shell out the money for the carpenter 240 upgrade...i would go turbo over blower all day long. one is for sale for a 3300 asking price currently
Triumph Rocket III Turbo Kit | eBay
a turbo is the way to go...no pressure on the front of the crank like a tts blower or others will place on the front bearings.
if you dont want to shell out the money for the carpenter 240 upgrade...i would go turbo over blower all day long. one is for sale for a 3300 asking price currently
Triumph Rocket III Turbo Kit | eBay
a turbo is the way to go...no pressure on the front of the crank like a tts blower or others will place on the front bearings.
I am wondering at what RPM would you say that the Carpenter engine eaquals or surpasses the stock Rocket on torque?
I am seriously considering a Carpenter upgrade, or possibly going with a blower.
With a blown engine I really don't want to have the concerns of possibly sometime getting some bad fuel without enough octane and certainly don't want to add octane booster with every fill up. I am aware of what low octane fuel does to a blown engine and don't want those concerns.
On the other hand, I don't want to have to rev the hell out of the engine either to get power.
My dilemna is that I live at an altitude of 5,000 ft. and 98% of my riding is between 5,000 and 11,000 ft. in altitude and there is considerable perfomance loss on a stock engine. I do trailer mine back home to cen tral IL when I go back home to visit. When in IL and much closer to sea level my Rocket runs so much stronger that I often have the front wheel in the air without trying.
My thoughts right now are that higher compression from Carpenter could make up a lot of my perfomance loss at the higher altitudes.