Two things Dennis
#1 the cost of getting it here to Auss is more than the tyre is worth
#2 that tyre has a centre rib which has been found by a few others to make it tend to track on grooves in the road surface
So I will stick with what I can get in Auss and also the federal 595 which I posted a picture of on the previous page has a very nice rounded transtion allowing me to flick it thru corners as quick as a bike tyre
new to r3 have a new R3T,( well 6700 miles on it now), and difinatily gotta go with a CT, due to the high milage i put on my bike. 12k to 14k a year on the old vtx 1800 i traded in reading these post, would the statement, "a Bridgestone Potenza 205/60/16" be a good introduction to a first time CT user?
...So I will stick with what I can get in Auss and also the federal 595 which I posted a picture of on the previous page has a very nice rounded transtion allowing me to flick it thru corners as quick as a bike tyre
You may believe that the last part of that sentence is true, but I can assure you to the 100th percentile that it is not , Hans, unless, of course, you have found some way to overcome certain laws of physics which allow you defeat the inherent design and engineering aspects of a CT that make your claim an impossibility.
I am not saying this to create a row or to chastise you for your choice - that is your right to make as you see fit - I state this for the benefit of others who might be evaluating the CT v. MT issue. Bottom line, a CT cannot physically be made to react or respond to maneuvering or road hazards, particularly when emergency and evasive actions need be taken, as quickly as a MT will under the same same circumstances.