Been comparing tunes for the R3R. My stock tune that came on the bike and the tors tune from the TuneECU site seem a little off on the I tables. The stock tune from 15-100 TP on the I tables have a lot more timing advance on them. Could this be a difference on the newer roadsters?
So I've been running the tune I posted above and it just isn't running right for normal riding (way too rich with hesitations in throttle response). So after looking at all the maps (stock, Tors, & my Dyno) I have made a new map to try out
until I get a copy of Franks map.
Here is what I did:
Used the 0-10 TP from the I4 table of the Tors map. (same or a little more advance than stock map)
Used the 15-100 TP from the I4 table of the stock map (on I1-4).
Used the L tables from the Tors map (to lean out the lower TP).
Used the 0-70 TP from the F tables of the Tors map (to lean out the lower TP).
Used the 78-100 TP from the F tables of my dyno map (cause I know they are not too rich or lean)
Once I run it for a few days I'll report back on how it does.
Frank - Did Bruce start with your stock map or did you load a map prior to him dynoing it? If so, which map did you start with?