I pretty well like all bikes..... but the Valk just doesn't do it for me!

The reason I bought the Roadster, it didn't look like a space cadet. There's no mistaking it for any other bike. I have never had anyone ask if it was a Harley. No other ride looks like it, accelerates like it, is ugly (in a nice kind of way) like it, turns heads like it..... did I say, I like it. I like the big rad and the ease with which the bike can be serviced. No need to pull numerous panels and plastic bits and pieces to.....

If the Valk is what a 2015 bike should look like to you, then sir, you might have a problem.....
 
Valk is ugly, that's why i like it i would also ride the wheels off of those 2 valks above:)
 
but when a comparable price Honda rider is turning heads out of the lot and I have to pull over and yell "no, it's not a Harley!" at random strangers after spending $10K on Corbin parts, that really doesn't make me feel like I got a good bang for the buck.

I don't get it.........

Are you saying you spent 10 grand and now your Rocket looks like a Harley? :thumbsdown::thumbsdown:
 
Last edited:
I still say the Victory Vision takes the ugly trophy. For me, it's what side/angle you are looking at our Rockets that might not be appealing. As for the Valk, I like the old school look better.
 
I don't care how ugly a bike is, any of them beats the hell out of a Ford Escort, Chevy Sonic or any of the ubiquitous auto offerings from the land of the rising sun (see I didn't use Jap). ;)

bob
 
I don't care how ugly a bike is, any of them beats the hell out of a Ford Escort, Chevy Sonic or any of the ubiquitous auto offerings from the land of the rising sun (see I didn't use ***). ;)

bob
My AMC Pacer is better looking:D
 
If the Valk is what a 2015 bike should look like to you, then sir, you might have a problem.....

Well, let's be honest here, the 2015 bike will look like the 2014 bike and every bike after that. Triumph isn't in business of updating the Rocket design.
 
Back
Top