Been thinking about a new Rocket 3 Touring

Bob R said:

The stock seat is a one piece front to rear where the long haul touring seat is actually two pads that you put together.

The stock pillion seat is 10" front to rear and 11" wide where the long haul touring pillion pad is 12" front to rear and 13" across the widest part. My wife says those couple of inches make a world of difference, especially when I put the dead animal (sheepskin) on it for her.

bob

Click to expand...

netmash said:

Buy the Rocket... you won't regret it. Bought my '15 in March and have about 2500 miles on it. Loving every minute of it!
Fast and powerful off the showroom floor. Cheap and easy to get an additional boost by remapping the ecu. a $20 cable will set you right
I am 5'11", 250lbs and the bike fits me almost perfect, except the windshield is a little short. Replacing that.
My butt does go numb after a couple hours. I am looking to replace the stock seat as well.
And +1 for ABS
My only complaint is the bike's sound... stock, it sounds like a Jetson's vehicle. Thinking of a slip on (TORS or D&D) to give it more of a growl.

Click to expand...

Eric R. said:

Thanks for that info Bob. If I do go for the R3T, and I can get the bonus money for accessories, I'd prolly do the seat setup, heated grips, and the Triumph adjustable highway peg setup.
I was looking on the Triumph accessory site, and I didn't see the drivers backrest that I assume goes with the long haul seat. Is it a Triumph backrest?
Thanks for any help, Eric

Click to expand...

Eric R. said:

Net mash, what do you mean by increasing power by a $20 cable?
Thanks, Eric

Click to expand...

Eric R. said:

Well I was able to locate a Rocket three touring today at a dealership. I got a good feel for it by sitting on it. The weight is down pretty low I assume due to the heavy crankshaft.
I am also interested in the Honda f6b deluxe. I was able to check that bike out today also. But for a bike that costs about $4000 more, they don't come with ABS. I couldn't believe it, and that is a big deterrent.
I did like the passenger seating room on the f6b and the wind protection is superior.
One of the first things that I would change with the rocket would be to switch to a larger windshield.
My wife liked the Honda a little more due to the bodywork and the more roomy rear seating area.
I'm not into too many gadgets though, and I could give or take the radio. I like the more basic layout of the rocket. So, I guess I've got some things to think about. I really did want my next bike to have ABS.

Click to expand...

Eric R. said:

Well the more I read and look, the more I'm unsure between the r3t and the f6b. At first, I was going to rule out the Honda due to the lack of abs, but maybe the linked braking is a good compromise.
I love the full fairing on the b but I remember when I had my wing, I used to have to really reach for the highway pegs due to the cylinders being right in the way. But the seating is much better on the b compared to a full wing. Much more room to move around.
The rockets engine is more narrow, so highway peg use won't be an issue I don't think.
The b must have a lower center of gravity, but maybe I'm worrying over nothing.
On a cold October morning, I'm going to wish for the fairing, but when it warms up out, I'm going to wish for the rocket.
I know motorcycles are a compromise, but I really want to get this right first time.
I still can't get past the bicycle like cable for the rockets clutch. I just don't get it. My last few bikes have been hydraulic, which is the way to go. I wish they wouldn't have skimped on that one item.

Click to expand...

IMFASTTOO said:

I have numerous bikes and several have Hydraulic clutches and Id rather have the cable clutch assy

Click to expand...