A little perplexed and curious.


No problema, Amigo! Apologies if I came on too strong.
Absolutely go your own way. I was just enjoying a good debate with a friend,
My issue is that I do not place opinions over science.
Mea culpa
 
I was just enjoying a good debate with a friend,
Ditto - Some definitions of SCIENCE
  • noun The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.
  • noun Such activities restricted to a class of natural phenomena.
  • noun A systematic method or body of knowledge in a given area.
  • noun Archaic Knowledge, especially that gained through experience.
Newton and Galileo or Einstein and Higgs? - Religion or Faith? - And Finally - Internet or Person? - heretical ramblings eh!.
 
I would probably not run a tire backwards myself, like Darksiders, it's just personal choice. As far as science, I guess I would say it's on the side of it wasn't designed to be run backwards and it probably wasn't ever tested running backwards at high speed. Like car tires and forward controls, when someone wins the Isle of Mann running a backwards tire, I might be more open.
 
On Crossplies it's tried and trusted. But they flex very differently.
My Guzzi's Avons are front/rear contra-rotation marked. And after all Avon invented the square Bike Tyre - the SM.
I dare say in the 1930's somebody ran (maybe won) a TT with a tyre on backwards.

But radials AFAIK have never been so marked.
There are scooter tyres that are front/rear rated and single direction and others that are counter rotated.

I've seen photos (on here I think) of radials that have de-laminated despite being correctly mounted and homologated.
 
When someone used the tyres they race on at IOM on their daily street rider then I will be very impressed.
 

Yes on your definition.
Study, experimentstion, and treaises.
The rest is not fact based.