Well I think that most of their research has panned out. As far as the looks go, I like both, and could have afforded a Harley. But I love Triumph (this is the second I have owned), and even if anyone thinks that this looks like a clone, or a Harley knock off... Do you really have to look hard to see the difference? Most looks and comments that I get are "Holy Crap!! That is a huge engine.... What kind of bike is it again?". I love the bike, and I love the features. Well except for the horn.... and the stock pipes.... and the tune down. But all of that can be fixed over time, and I am in it for the long haul my friends.
:kick:
D.
 
Dennis, please don't let that horn stop your purchase.If you buy it Ill give you my Stebel,138 DBs. Was 13 bucks at Checker..But yes I bet that horn is a big joke on the assembly line while some bean counter showes how much they saved in 5 years. Biggest bike in production with the smallest horn. How can you think that its not a joke on us owners?? I would like to know If the same horn is on all bikes for all countries..Can not believe it past muster in all countries..YUK
 
Wow . . bought it on the wifeys birthday huh? I did that too . . . told her the back half was hers . . .ended up buying her a Speedmaster later to make up. Congrats on the touring R3. I've been thinking seriously about trading mine in on one . . .
 
Thanks Jack, I may take you up on that if I do end up taking the plunge, with a loud horn I could probably overlook that single headlight and decrease of HP.
Dennis
 
The horn definately has to go. Triumph has no right putting such a whimpy horn on a bike like the Rocket.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top