hp/torque mods and dyno sheets

You will make the most power with a 3 into 1 exhaust and its also lighter no point in running 2 or 3 pipes unless your stuck on that look
maybe so but I like the look and the sound of the twin pipes and last dyno run in woodinville was showing 150HP and 148 torque
pretty go for a stock engine
 
That's pretty good, Bull, with just headers and tuning!

Very happy with Nels' tuning work. Kong runs well - BUT - I do want some more!
Close comparisons are sorta useless as Dynos vary a fair amount one to another.
@albertaduke and I were tuned the same day, back to back and were within 4 hp of each other.
Nels credited that my CES seemed to work better than his Jardines, but his Ram Air likely breathed a little better than my trip K&Ns.


Patrick, you were 154 HP, not 150!
And 158.7 TQ, not 148!
I have your dyno sheet. :p
 
Last edited:

Good web site - saved it for future reference.
Thanks!
 
I never did like the unbalanced look of stock pipes, just looks wrong from behind IMHO.
I still use the jardine crossover pipe to feed left side 3 pipes.


Not as efficient as 3-1, I know but I like to be individual not blindly follow a certain crowd.
Good for you Wannbe make it YOUR own. :thumbsup:
 
I have stock bike with TORS! If I added triple KN's and PCV and a tune about what HP and FT lbs, should I get?
 
That knee at 5350 rpm is killing your top end.
I had it as well, even after installing good headers and having a custom dyno tune in a PCIII. It is a software knee.
It disappeared after a good tuner tuned the ECU itself and threw the PC3 out. That tune instantly gave me a 50+ hp increase at 6300 rpm over the PC3 tune, without any new parts.
So you might have a considerable herd of easy ponies, still waiting to be awakened in the top end.
 

Thanks ThinKing. Do you if it's from having the secondaries opened at the top end?