New - looking to get an R3

I see you have it - I'd love to hear your thoughts on it if you could.

I got my 2015 Touring off the floor new last April from Windy City Triumph.

The Touring comes de-tuned to 96 hp. Last year I put a Hanso tune in it and installed TORS.

I am in the process of installing the RamAir and @Paul Bryant 's custom cross over.

I hope to get a Dyno on it this summer to see what it will be producing.

I am at your service any time you need me. We are not that far apart. I went up to Knox last year 4 or 5 times to get tickets at the VFW.
 
Once you mentally adjust to the torque the Rocket makes, no bike will ever feel the same again. I've tried describing to others why nothing else truly interests me anymore, but always come up lost for words.

The carpenter power is totally tractable, and accessible as long as your pointed in a safe direction with sufficient space to distort reality. Docile as could be when cruising, very very easy to modulate power, you get a throttle reaction directly proportional to the amount you open it, as it should be, instead of "a whole bunch of power by 70% and then not much of a difference between 70 and 100" as is found on nearly every car, and to some degree the stock R3.

The fact the R3 comes with 56mm TBs is clear evidence Triumph never originally intended for the bike to only make 120hp/150lbft at the wheel, those power levels could have been achieved with much smaller TBs which would have fit the stock power level better.

Coincidentally, the new superduke R also comes with 56mm TBs, and makes a lot more power per liter than the stock R3. Infact, 150whp/95lbft * (1.33)*(1.17) (to account for the missing cylinder and displacement) = ~235hp, probably right around where Triumph originally intended the power level to be, and, coincidentally (or not depending who you ask), just a little under what a 265kit bike on pump gas makes.
 
Billy: awesome! I'm sure that once i get a bike ill take you up on that! Claviger: thank you for sharing, that's great information, and yeah a 56mm tb seems huge.....
 
So my next question:

I will most likely be buying used, so is there any year i should look for or avoid? I assume that they're all pretty much the same, but figured I'd ask. Also, i know that the touring comes with less power than the roadsters, but can that be fixed with a tune? If so, I'll probably get a touring.

Thanks again everyone!
 
Generally speaking any model about halfway into the 2009 factory run or newer, saw the factory or design-induced problems that were common in earlier models corrected or eliminated, ibified. Earlier models are fine provided that they come with a pedigree (proof) that certain corrections, updates or modifications have been performed.

Warp 9.9 or someone else can provide you with the VIN or production run #s delineating the good from the potentially bad or ugly units...
 
Bear in mind there is more that differs between the Touring and the rest than just the tune and rider position.

The most significant to the feel of the ride will be the fork type/geometry and the rear tire size difference.

That said, the happy middle ground, a non-touring that makes a good touring bike or a touring that feels closer to a non-touring can be achieved, so pick which one feels better to you.
 
What's different on the touring vs the roadster? Bags, windshield, non - inverted forks, driving lights, seating position, and smaller tires. Anything else?
 
Tank, seat, rear sub frame, no tachometer, damping rod vs cartridge fork internals, wheels etc etc. It's just made up to be a bit more relaxed position, suited to it's intended use ofc.