Was listening to a summary of the shooter's manifesto, reportedly about 70 pages. He described himself as originally a Marxist, then a libertarian and presently an eco-Fascist. There was another one but can't recall.
He stated that he chose a firearm to commit the murders in order to start a civil war in the US, holding the belief that the left would try to restrict gun ownership and sieze firearms while gun owners would shoot those who try to sieze them. Most admired country is China. He hates Conservatives.
Two recent bits of news are that NZ's prime minister intends to tighten firearms laws while there is a spike in gun purchases by citizens who fear their gun rights will be restricted. "Rights" could be a term chosen my the journalists. It is my understanding that, unlike the US, there is no inherent right to own firearms, that it is rather permission, tightly controlled, given by the government in all of the Commonwealth nations. Would one of our NZ forum members please clarify if there is any right to own firearms embodied in law or constitution.