GREAT New Tire Report

This little bugger has caught me out once or twice. It is about halfway from the coast to home and is preceeded a long very mind numbing motorway session. At dark in the wet - Oh what fun.

Google Maps
 

Well good, because as much as I appreciate the Scorcher II, I can't help but grumble a bit at all the HD branding on it. Looks like I'll have a different tire up front come next spring.

Thanks @1olbull for the review, and you know, using your body for science and all.
 
Lifetime expectancy?

Longer than Road 4s which are known to be very long lasting tires.

This is exactly why I find it inexcusable offense that Triumph put a 16" wheel on the Rocket. Literally ALL of the best tires are 17" tires, the newest designs, and the best tech all comes out at 17" first.

The Road 5 and Power RS are so far ahead of any other street tire its ridiculous. It's not until you get into advanced group on a track where any tire can compete, and even then, they're DOT legal race tires, the Dunlop Q4, Dunlop Q3+, and there some abomination 1000 mile lasting pirelli that's better at the extreme end of the bell curve.

The incredible part is how Michelin have been able to provide such amazing grip and yet still equal or better their competitors on mileage and price in most cases.

Note, Avon have released a new Cobra model which is supposed to better the AV71/AV72 for grip and durability.

//end rand
 
Here they can sort of creep up on you. We have these "cloverleaf" junctions. I have hit loads only to find them tighten up real fast even junctions between 2 motorways. So whist I don't intentionally hoon - sometimes.............................

Spanish civil engineers must suck worse than ours.
A descending roadway radius causes collisions and usually are the result of pisspoor planning.
We have some over here, but thankfully not to many.
I always maintain a small portion of my hooning brain just to remain vigilant to recognize them.
 

OK maestro ToroViejo... Exedra Max in the back and Michelin Road 5 150/70 run backwards in the front. Now I'll be faster in the back pack and feel better when the pavement is wet. Getting a new set to take to RAA. Cost twice as much as the Shinkos. It better be guud
 
Sinko are cheaper and not a bad tire but i only got 3500 miles out of the rear so savings is cut some by replacing faster. Kind of like the DS wearing the front out faster eating into your savings anyway. I am curious how these new bridgstones fare out. If all else fails and they don't make a 16 inch rim. The front might go well with the max. After im done with these if I m not smittened with them I'll give the michelins a try. Eitherway the turn in agility should change because the 18 inch rear bridgy is smaller the the 16 inch Exedra Max. Still centerline of the rear will be above the front so we shall see. Supposed to hit 80 today so after I get a new set of tires on my daughters car (that she don't know about) I might have time to change the rubber out. Who knows the itch to ride and not muck around is heavy
 
Okay...after reading this I have to ask....why run the tire backwards?

From what I understand from previous posts, the rear tire is designed to handle mostly acceleration stress. Front tires are designed to handle mainly deceleration stress. If the force vector is reversed it is advisable to reverse the tire that will have to take it.

My only issue is with the groves water dispersing function. Instead of directing water laterally the groves will direct water medially. Huuuuum? Can you imagine, hitting a puddle and shazzaaam out goes the front tire