Martin_z_BA
.060 Over
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
- Messages
- 133
- Ride
- everywhere
Hello all,
in EU and probably also in rest of the world we have "bioecowarming" madness transferred to adding some chemical staff to the petrol. Sometimes 5%, sometimes 10%. Sometimes alcohol, sometimes something else. But only a sick head could have thought it up. In the fact, the real results are:
1) Higher fuel consumption. The engine needs for example 1l of petrol to run. If instead it receives 1l of a mixture that realistically contains only 0.9l of petrol + 0,1l of ****, it will realistically consume 1.11l of fuel mixture for the same let's say distance or working hour.
2) Ruined tropical forests and agriculture. This "bio" has caused natural forests to be burned and palm trees to be planted in sub-tropical and tropical countries as part of this ****ed-up ecology. The oil from them is then transported in ships halfway around the world.
3) Damage of the engines. Mistakenly I forget some old petrol**** in the tank of my old motorcycle for a year. It took out the engine, which was theoretically built for it, but this crap clogged the injectors so that the engine is unable to idle revolutions.
The result in summary: higher consumption, cleared forests and destroyed engines. Bioecobluegreen in the socialist-brussels way.
But by buying of the Rocket the seller told me that 100-octane petrol is not good option and I should not use it due to overheating. What do you think about it? Do you have some personal experience? Of course, by really daily use, the mixture of real petrol and some "replacement" could not be problem, even nobody knows from long-time view. But, Rocket is not from the cheapest things and I would like to not risk clogged nozzles or destroyed rubber hoses and gaskets.
Thanks for you opinions and answers!
in EU and probably also in rest of the world we have "bioecowarming" madness transferred to adding some chemical staff to the petrol. Sometimes 5%, sometimes 10%. Sometimes alcohol, sometimes something else. But only a sick head could have thought it up. In the fact, the real results are:
1) Higher fuel consumption. The engine needs for example 1l of petrol to run. If instead it receives 1l of a mixture that realistically contains only 0.9l of petrol + 0,1l of ****, it will realistically consume 1.11l of fuel mixture for the same let's say distance or working hour.
2) Ruined tropical forests and agriculture. This "bio" has caused natural forests to be burned and palm trees to be planted in sub-tropical and tropical countries as part of this ****ed-up ecology. The oil from them is then transported in ships halfway around the world.
3) Damage of the engines. Mistakenly I forget some old petrol**** in the tank of my old motorcycle for a year. It took out the engine, which was theoretically built for it, but this crap clogged the injectors so that the engine is unable to idle revolutions.
The result in summary: higher consumption, cleared forests and destroyed engines. Bioecobluegreen in the socialist-brussels way.
But by buying of the Rocket the seller told me that 100-octane petrol is not good option and I should not use it due to overheating. What do you think about it? Do you have some personal experience? Of course, by really daily use, the mixture of real petrol and some "replacement" could not be problem, even nobody knows from long-time view. But, Rocket is not from the cheapest things and I would like to not risk clogged nozzles or destroyed rubber hoses and gaskets.
Thanks for you opinions and answers!